Hawaiian To English Translation

Daily Work, live and laugh

few months ago I asked for a presentation on the art of reconciling work and personal life. Perhaps the message was an investment focus in terms. Life is not the reconciliation. Is valued just living to excess.
as in the preparation and standing of the different sheets I projected I relied on some ideas that come from different players in history, writers, musicians, philosophers, businessmen, artists, film directors, politicians.
Each of these short reflections contains a truth and invites us to think. The challenge is to understand the order of events and why. To this the summon.

"Life is what happens and what happens ... while we pay attention to other things " John Lennon
" never find time to do the things you love when you're muerto.Es why you have to find when you live "-David Hume-
" important thing is not what makes us the destination. What matters is what we do with it "-Fernando Savater-
" Impossible means you have not yet found the solution "-Henry Ford
" sweeten life's work ... but do not cloy " -Oscar Wilde-
" Give me a chisel and be happy "-Miguel Angel Buenarroti-
" Some people dream of success, while others seek to wake up ... and enjoy it "-Voltaire-
"Luck is intersection talent and opportunity. Works in both directions "Jorge Luis Borges
" If all the year were party would be fun to work boring. "- William Shakespeare
" I love the work. I could be sitting for hours watching others how work "-Woody Allen-
" not work that ennobles the man but he is the man who dignified work "- John Locke-
" Hypocrisy is the homage vice to virtue taxed " De La Rocheafould
" Where the soul works with his hands, there is no art " Leonardo Da Vinci
"Nothing is as difficult as not deceiving" Ludwig Wittgeinstein
"The worst day of my job is the one who did not laugh" Albert Camus

Satin Underwear For Women

Friederich Nietzsche and look at time spent

continue in the previous entry in this trilogy Friederich. I promise not to bore you too much. This will be the last I'll dedicate (for now) the difficult, brilliant and broken Nietzsche. This time I want to dwell on the approach he made about the scope and limits of the three types of stories that he characterized in 1874 to write his essay "... history to life" and share the final reflection on our view of our own life stories.

Niezsche said: " Life needs the service history and in three aspects belongs to the living being: 1) to the extent that it is an active being and pursues a goal (Monumental History), 2) in extent that preserves and reveres what he has done (History Antiquarian) or 3) to the extent that suffers and has a need to release ( Critical History.) Making a comparison of these species of plants Stories, Nietzsche suggests that each is justified in soil and climate in particular: a) when a man wants to do something great takes over the monumental, b) when someone tries persist in the usual and is revered by the time an antiquarian and c) when someone has a need for freedom from a burden, analyzes, judges, and condemns in the critical history. However, if reckless transplants from one species to another, the story suffers, degenerates and fails to provide service to life. Let us then, carefully, the scope of each of these three species of stories.

Monumental History, according to Friedrich, is one that presents the events of the past as examples worthy of imitation and possible a second time but widespread, matching things that are different, and ignoring the differences in motives and sometimes to the detriment of the cause and as a collection of events that would take effect at all times. And here is where the danger of distortion is present. " Monumental History deceives analogies" says Nietzsche, "with seductive similarities encourages the brave to recklessness and enthusiastic fanaticism." Much worse is when the stories past and want to repeat the selfish monumental talent and inactive or powerless beings who do not notice that the causes of the facts are different. Nietzsche says that often people who advocate hate monumental history talented and powerful of his time and dressed with this view of history take refuge in their opposition to the greatness is born: "You boast of being doctors when actually supplied poison. "

Antiquarian History belongs to those who preserves and reveres the past precisely because it is. All that is small, limited, decrepit and outdated gets its own dignity and virtue of his seniority. No one wants to change even when a reality show rough and even painful. The field of view of the antiquarian is limited, given too much importance to detail and unique things, everything that is old is revered and reaches over to reject and show hostility to all things new. The dealer thus weakens the mind, and not life but retains the mummified, becomes a blind collector of everything that ever existed and thereby causes death the tree of history is useful, gradually dissected from the top to the roots and thus degenerates antiquarian history and show its fallacy.

Critical History is one that analyzes the time spent judging through life. It is life that is happening, who delivered the verdict. And it does so without mercy and may even unfairly. Is that it is live. And the critical history can often be forgotten temporarily suspend and review the past "with a knife at its roots." It is a dangerous process because judges who in turn is the product of generations with errors, aberrations and crimes and therefore difficult to be that anyone who criticizes not want to distort history as denial of the past. But some critics do and do it well and serve life with a liberating contribution contributes to human development.

We saw three species of great history Friederich. Let us now leave aside Nietzsche. I now want to reflect with you readers about their history, looking back on her, that is, about his life. When we look back, we do think in the great moments that should be repeated (and remain as passive spectators watching a theater), or do we dwell on details and the pleasure of the dust of past events that must be passed worship and gather with fear and without moving biography that circle? o surrender our life to a detailed view and a merciless criticism we do with this life we \u200b\u200bknow subjective? You respond, you know.

Employee Confirmation Letter Sample

Friederich: his view of history

At 30 years old, Wilheilm Friederich Nietzsche wrote an essay on how to do History, under the suggestive title "From the usefulness and disadvantages in history to life." Perhaps most interesting about this work is their particular vision on how to make history in an efficient manner and at the same time, Nietzsche makes the approach over time. But this test can not be understood fully if it is interpreted in context. The year was 1874, Nietzsche had been severely attacked by the local academic critical content in his first book " The origin of Greek tragedy " had made the culture of ancient Greece. It's that unwavering loyalty to the truth that their actions had led into question a legend idyllic German intellectuals had with the Greco-Roman Culture: Nietzsche had on not only the virtues analysis detached from the Greek god Apollo (the restraint and order ), but those coming from the God Dionysos (brute force, irrationality and excess.) The latter did not please the German academics who saw in the Greek past a role model, based on the virtues "Apolinar" of this civilization, but without delving into the history of defects arising in Dionysius. Opinions against Nietzsche for such work and the subsequent attack on his academic position at the University were the breeding ground reaction Friederich, which with a prose and a depth worthy of Plato turned in his essay on " Utility and drawbacks in the history to life "to destroy the arguments of his critics. The title of the work left to explain his reason: Nietzsche begins by citing the words of Goethe in reference to his rejection of everything that not only instructs but quickened. Nietszsche indicates that the same happens with the "history": "... we need history to life and action, not away from it and less to cover it up "and thus comes as a bad report of his time in Germany (and indirectly of his critics). Suggests that the "historical culture" is not a virtue prevailing in Germany, but a "defect" and that in his homeland are suffering from an "illness", a "devouring historical fever" and as a classical scholar should be allowed to act time. Thus, ten chapters of this paper, crumble and analyzes the history and forms (and incidentally is dedicated, with an almost obsessive detail, to demolish the foundations of those who felt less the contribution of their work and their work University).

Nietsche The central thesis developed in this paper is that both " the historical and the unhistorical are equally necessary for the health of individuals, peoples and cultures ." For Nietzsche the importance of forgetting the past is a critical tool that makes the benefit of the good life. Stresses the herd of animals and children who have no past to deny and to concentrate on what they do at present is to jump a fence or a game to play, and it weighs in man as an element that makes happiness , "ability to sense a non-historical as the happiness lasts, ie, ignoring the past. The core of thought Nietzsche in this essay argues that man must have a right balance between the historical (what you should know, remember and use for the benefit of the present life) and ahistorical (what should be remembered as the excess of history and memory disturbed and buries the present) to germinate life and man becomes a man. Nietzsche seeks not mummify the history and bind its movement and flexibility for the utility of this. It is ahistorical it operates as a "modified atmosphere" without which life is extinguished and did not even have dared to start and jump-start to live. Hence the essential function of this circle ahistorical taking care of crucial value precisely history: to serve for life and not to be a museum of memories.
Nietzsche goes further and raises the sense superhistórico sobrehistórico or as a stepping stone to even greater historical modes of analyzing the past. What is this? We split. The sense "sobrehistórico" is that in the atmosphere indicated sniffs of "ahistorical", than be forgotten. In this context the look superhistórica rises and does not feel seduced to live or to participate in history or tempted to take in the future the story too seriously and he has encountered in past events why and wherefore of their existence. Is that pointing to what men should forget historical over-end in which past and present are one and the same thing (represent a fixed, immutable structure and meaning "eternally the same.") Nietzsche concludes that "It is not surprising if you have names of poison antidotes against the historical: the" ahistorical "(art and the strength to forget) and the" supra-historical "(the forces that look away from what is in the process of becoming and the target which gives character to the existence of the eternal and unchanging, such as art and religion).