Friday, December 31, 2010

Free Rental Agrrement Simple Room

Friederich, three

The small town called Rock in Prussia in 1844 (now Germany) very near Lützen, is famous for two circumstances that combines history, was a battleground for more than two hundred years (of the Thirty Years War in 1600 and the Napoleonic Wars in 1800) and was the birthplace, a year 15 October above, an intellectual warrior will struggle to madness against the ideas of his time: Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche. Marked
mysterious circumstances by spinning the pendulum of life from one extreme to another, Friederich, which would sentence in his "death of God", was born into an extremely religious family where his two grandparents and even your father were pastors. Just to underline the extreme, let that his paternal grandfather, also named Friedrich Nietzsche was the ultimate responsibility in the region of Reformed Churches and published a paper that only the irony of fate can look today with a mischievous smile in perspective by the revolution in the beliefs that led to his grandson . The pompous title of the work of Nietzsche grandfather was: "On the duration of the Christian life for instruction and quiet in the current turmoil of the theological world" ...
Friedrich's childhood was tormented and suffering followed closely: the five years, and in less than six months had faced the death of two of her closest loved ones: his father, Rocken the youth pastor, Don Carl Nietzsche Ludwigg 35 years of age, and younger brother Ludwig Joseph of two years. The paternal grandmother, Erdmuthe, virtually became head of his family (mother of Friederich, Franzisca married at age 17 and since then accepted the dominant role of her mother) and family decided to move to the city of Naumburg, This also impacted strongly on Friederich that at 7 years was without father or his brother and not his house and field to find ways of sudden, in the municipal school of this city, with new partners with whom wanted little to do and where the constant search of solitude and contact managed to calm down with nature. Thus the small Friederich found alternatives in music (he was a virtuoso and passionate of the discipline), literature (the writing of essays and books shows exquisite touches of pen) and the small but loyal friendship (which was essentially based intellects sharing). His mother, amazed at his talents bent by his love of music and bought him a piano Friederich served to grow their passion and ability. With his friends, and families of them grew culturally Firederich: knew the works of Schumann, Mendelssohn, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven and read everything in its path falling in love Goethe and especially of the classical Greeks, who studied, played and dominated as only an extraordinary mind as it can. With effort and dedication (Friederich wanted to study at the highest levels available because that bored him not to go to the heart of his favorite subjects) came to get a place at elite school where he began his vocation Schulpforta with philology (the science that studies the origin of language) which led him to continue with the reading of all books and begin with his writings in the association "Germania" (which created a couple of close friends in school.) A After receiving a bachelor's degree in 1864 he decided to deepen and study classical philology as a science to be received at the University of Leipzig. It is in this city where he meets Schopenhauer books (is struck especially by "The World as Will and Representation") who strongly influenced his interest in philosophy and unwavering commitment to the truth. It is for that time that Nietzsche breaks with the religion to realize that it is incompatible with science and reason out of emotion. Was not this a decision that cost him but his mind made him the unwavering commitment to jump on their family tradition and fight for the truth of all knew that his great brain. In 1868 he met a talent unequaled in the world of music: the great Richard Wagner, who immediately generates a significant empathy. His admiration for the musician is paid by the interest of Wagner, and his young wife, by the writings of the young Nietzsche. It opens a possibility at the University of Basel and 24 years (breaking all the protocols of the time) was appointed professor in the Department of Philology, a circumstance which naturally causes resentment in the local academic youth aware of the new Professor Nietzsche. Begin a lifetime of study and dedication to his chair and philosophical research and writing essays and works (at this stage arise "The Birth of Tragedy" and the first "Untimely Meditations"). Were ten years as owner of his chair at Basel he took much effort. His health, never good, began to crumble, with severe headaches, insomnia and seizures that doctors could not alleviate. Nietzsche finds a solution to their physical conditions in certain areas warm summer climates that allow you to be better. It becomes a pilgrim, isolated in their speculations, continues its work (in 1882 wrote The Gay Science and in 1883 "Thus spake Zaratrustra). For summer of those she met Lou Salomé, a young Russian woman of talent (that life will be close to both Nietzsche and Sigmund Freud), who will be mad and disappointed at different times of his life. Lou was a companion of a great friend of Nietzsche, Paul Ree and decide to live a season together in a group they called "Trinity" and ended with jealousy and resentment that Firederich left alone in 1883. In that year he began to publish "Thus Spake Zarathustra" to continue in 1886 with "Beyond Good and Evil" and the following year "The Genealogy of Morals." His physical ailments, his pilgrimage the mountain in search of places to assuage their torments, his life in the dark for the huge inconvenience that caused the light, his "philosophy of the hammer" against everything that had no solid foundation, made the last years of an ordeal Friederich . In 1889, the year he was born Adolf Hitler, Nietzsche lose at trial, her mother cares for him until his sister Elizabeth moved to Weimar (and appears to become owner of his work, and publishing anti-Semitic twist it works with corrections to the loyal secretary and friend of Friedrich, Ritschlm not allowed). The great Friederich dies August 25, 1900, and began a different stage in the thought of us all that even touched by his genius and strength. Here begins the best ... will be three.

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Climbing Cargo Nets Parts

Know Time

Some words simple but complex. Are those that use both presume we know, we think we dominated and we assume we understand, not realizing that nothing that we certainly true. An example of what is said the word "Time." What is Time? What does the concept? If we turn to the Dictionary of the English Royal Academy the results confirm our warning is given seventeen meanings in its definition, an amount that shows that it is not easy to define the term. Among them we read that the time is: (1) the " duration of things subject to change." (2). the "physical quantity that allows to order the sequence of events, establishing a past, present and future. ." (3) "part of this sequence " or (4) "during which time lives someone or something happens." There are several more. But I stop here. Every time we handle the concept. We all know what we mean but if you ask us we can not explain it. Something like that was what Augustine said he reflected on the subject in his "Confessions", and it seems that the one who came closest to describing a reality that continues 1700 years after his death. Is that the concept invades us, overwhelms us, we feel his presence in every moment (And indeed in this phrase when talking about "time" refers to time). There is more to go out and pay attention to feel the time. I'll drive. I listen to the radio. announce summer songs (starting in an hour), that just tomorrow are forecast 34 degrees in temperature, the next Thursday is Christmas Eve. Miro distracted from the traffic light that stops me: "Parking: $ 6 hours." In a poster neighbor: "No Parking 8.00 to 20.00." Jump to the eye. I run a picture of a beach inscirpción amazing and says: "Come to the Caribbean. Enjoy our beaches all year . I'm surprised. The concept of time around me. Look at the sky in an attempt to empty reflection. The clouds are moving slowly. As I think about what I see, the sound of cars brings me to the ground and suddenly realizes that light changed. I would move. There is traffic. silent protest. Why protest? stared at the entrance to the Underworld. I read a faded sign: "Travel by subway. Win Time. "I wake up.

In all the examples given time is represented either in one of the four seasons in the forecast tomorrow, the cost of one hour of parking or prohbición to do in a particular place between such and such time, on the grounds of the protest of traffic in the cloud that does not stand still, in the subway advertising. All that is Time. What are we talking about then?. Because of something that passes, passing, which is not stopped, moving constantly and (this is relevant and critical) is measured. Timing has been the great revolution in history. Are measurements of the calendar time, day, hour, minutes and seconds. There are other symbols that we use to compute the passage of time and which have existed since thousands of years before Christ (when the sun rises, when it falls on the next full moon, when the snows arrive, rains, ships to port the first star ...). This reflects MOVEMENT, earth, stars, matter. And where there is movement time. That is why there are conventions on time, in every city, every country, worldwide. Its purpose is commanding, provide common parameters (I realize and wonder "how in ancient times when they would not measure time accurately? There were no clocks or calendars, or weekdays. We all arrived late? how to express the idea of \u200b\u200b"See you next Tuesday"? not celebrating anyone's birthday? "There was a holiday? Finally, the tardy happy ...). I return to the discussion and tell me myself, "Okay . I accept that. The weather is something that happens and that makes us understand that there was a past, present, and that there exist future." I calm down. I feel I start to dominate the definition.

But I am satisfied. There is something I can not decipher. What is meant by "Present"? Using logic and try to define it by what is not, " Present is what is not past or future." This mean that I'm writing now is Present. But that is exactly what I write "now"? If I read what I wrote to say that is past. If I can not read because I did not write yet, that's future. Damn! How do I catch the "Now"? There are some as I say " micromilésima the Now is a second that you can enjoy with a smile looking at the camera." Sounds pretty stupid, right? However, the conclusion comes and gives me chills. Digámsolo at once: the "present" is not affordable, it is not testable until it happened and therefore can not say that this exists at present . There is only the immediate past, mediate and remote past but the present moment disappears when you try to stop it and combine it in mind as the future is not reached because it is not yet built ... and when it is, and forget the time future to look at it from time past. Is strong but it's true. Life tests of this are the past. This action meant the sum of the same construct that past. Is that last saw action and the future but both will not have it in mind. What I interpret as the "now" is precisely why this happened, because it happened, ie was not it .... and thus confirm my statement: witness the complexity in time ...

still believe. I'm a little stunned. And not if I live the present, foretell the future or the past built but what if the past is that the future is a must Transit station and called the Present. Therefore the "Present" exisitió if we look at it in perspective. Volume air. Reflect. The issue is then to establish a basic unit of measurement of the station called "Present."

the present time is the life I live. Heidegger said so to us with his " Dassein" the human existence. I build my life every day consuming the present and archiving it in the past. Understanding the time is to understand death. Understand that human life is present during various introduces us to the question of our finitude, just be temporary, with the passage of this concept, ie the time, made of past, present and future came and future hopes that are uncertain but may pass.

Now I understand why it is difficult to define the concept, because it makes life itself and because its size is unknown. We do not know its size. Stalking death should make it extremely desirable to enjoy the time, that moment for the future that will become this and that moment of mind that last call. So we must build our lives, living long. Being aware of its meaning should compel us to celebrate, pamper you, to care. At day's end time is synonymous with long life and know what it means ... is to enjoy your life.

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Chikan Movies Train Buses

What kind of man will have been Adam?

science dives deeper than religion. While this would seem to do it with a short snorkel surface, the first deployed their oxygen tanks and a high-tech equipment to descend into the depths Recondo and closer to the truth. The differences are obviously apparent. Religions explain the origin of humans with the divine creation of first man, Adam, and the first woman, Eve (from the side of that). Science explains what fossils, archeology, carbon-14 and hundreds of thousands of discoveries analyzed, discussed, evaluated, published and even today continuing study to improve the information obtained. Religion does otherwise. Sacred books were written and many of its truths depend precisely on the sacredness alluded. Full stop, literally.

is clear that at the time the Bible was written that science had not been down to the Deep aforementioned. The degree of knowledge that was the origin of living things was pure intuition and legends. There was no media, no studies were available, there was no research, no books. Everything is limited to the originality of seasoned writers. Consider that the Bible (or Tanach for Jews) was written over approximately 1000 years (900 BC - 100 AD) and the oldest complete book, the century of Hosea is XI BC, at which time, of course, no information or studies to share. Libraries and the Internet still not working.

In a swift investigation, we discovered that humans first came into the world, millions and millions of years after it was created. That is, and to better understand if the base set off back the planet Earth has been the work of a great architect, the fact is that this would have taken some time between creating the world and then created man. You may need to be sure to bring life to our antepsados. The funny thing is that it took so long for such a task! Is that there were a few days or a few years of earth alone ... Were about 15 billion years, according to scientists today explain most scholars. Lovey-dovey pause between one thing and another. But regardless of years of difference, science explains further that the first relatives of ours who walked this world, were not exactly like us. Had to spend a long time until humans evolve to the men and women today. Let's see.

The former seem to have been the Australopithecus or "southern apes", who were the first bipedal hominids (walking on two legs and could run on flat terrain). This relative had powerful jaws and strong molars. Long limbs and spent much of his life in the trees. His brain had a volume less than 400 cubic centimeters. It follows that walking upright was long before brain expansion. His height did not exceed 1.20 m. in height and 30 kg in weight. Time that these records appeared: 4 million years ago and are representadon by a group of pre-human fossils found in southern and eastern Africa. The oldest fossils are about 5 million years and the most recent 1 million years. The first Australopithecus was found in the 1960 East Africa (Ethiopia) and was called Lucy.

After Lucy seems to have reached the Homo habilis ("handy man") is kind of hominid, had to adopt more upright position because of climatic variations grew grasslands and forced to stand on their feet to spot potential hazards. They had larger brains, about 750 cubic centimeters. Its most important feature was the change in the way food: not only ate fruits and vegetables but also animals. Hairy body. Currently, researchers disagree about whether Homo habilis and produced intentionally hunting tools to do so. Are believed to have spoken. Fossils were found in the Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania) with the first utensils. Age of these friends: 2 million years ago.

came after the Homo erectus ("upright man") also called Pithecanthropus Erectus. Some saw this as the direct representative of the man, but now known to many previous austratopithecus had similar features. They are the first hominids were widely distributed over the surface of the planet, reaching the Southeast and East Asia. Body deep, thick eyebrows and big muscles. Had a brain larger than that of homo habilis, about 1,100 cubic centimeters. They found the use of fire and produced the first hand ax. The first Homo erectus was found in Java (Oceania) at the end of last century. The discovery of hominid remains of this species in Beijing caves allowed the reconstruction of some aspects of his life. Seniority of our relatives "erectus": 1.5 million years

It was not long (in this size ...) to reach the Homo sapiens ("wise man") lived in Europe, Africa and Asia. Archaeological findings reflect important changes in the behavior of this species: use of stone tools and bones worked, changes in the ways of hunting, use and control of fire, use of clothing, increase in population size, ritual manifestations and artistic. The representative of Homo sapiens is the oldest Neanderthal (Germany). Joined: we may say "before yesterday": of 150,000 to 200,000 years

But one is missing. Homo sapiens sapiens (modern man) Its physical characteristics are the same as those of modern humans. His brain capacity is about 1,400 cubic centimeters. It is believed that appeared in Europe about 40,000 years ago. Homo sapiens sapiens is the one that starred from 10,000 BC, major changes in the economic and social organization, as the first forms of agriculture and domestication of animals, and life in cities. His most faithful representative of the Cro-Magnon (France). As my grandmother Anita, "seems que fue ayer", hace 35.000 o 40.000 años.

Pues bien, de este rápida descripción, concluímos en que la ciencia indica que los seres humanos aparecieron hace 4 o 5 millones de años y los últimos, hace 40.000 años atrás. Mi duda es ¿cuál de estas criaturas habra tenido como vecino a Adán? La primera respuesta que me viene a la mente es responder como me enseñaron: "Adán fue el primer hombre" , es decir, Adán debiera haber existido entre los Australopithecus hace 4 o 5 millones de años. Pero esto no me cierra. Si Adán (y luego Eva) vivieron hace tanto tiempo atrás, como es posible que hayan pasado 4 millones de años hasta que se escribieran their lives ... It's hard to keep from one generation to this report. Nor do I close that Adam has been an Australopithecus because they had a very small brain that almost did not allow them to think and solve conflicts with their intellect. This is a very strong argument. Recall that Adam and Eve were before the enormous stress of resolving conflicts worst of humanity, eating or not eating the apple of good or evil. If this decision triggered the original sin I do not think God had submitted to all human beings after the grief out of Paradise and the tremendous punishment that this situation resulted in their offspring and descendants, by a pair of human beings a brain volume less than 400 cubic centimeters, a size would not exceed 1.20 m. height and 30 kg in weight. I refuse to believe it. Adam and Eve were higher.

But ... I'm not sure. On second thought, if this pair origin of the human species (never got along with who had children Cain and Abel !!!!!!!!!) had not belonged to our first family, the australopithecines, religion does not accept whatever other category, Homo habilis or Homo erectus or sapiens ... because this would prove that emerged from the evolution of the species and not of divine origin ... Damn, I'm at a crossroads. The thought does not leave me alone. Just let me questions: What kind of man will have been Adam? What you do you think?

Saturday, December 11, 2010

How To Tighten The Needle When Sewing In Weave

created with the mind. Painting with soul

Pablo Ruiz Picasso
breath ninety-one years. Even today, no longer breathe, live and live hundreds of years. Born in Malaga, Spain on October 25, 1881 to die in France, his second home, on April 8, 1973. It was an absolute genius on the scale of his work, his creativity and originality, his rebellion to the mainstream, their analysis and interpretation of painters great and historic art mixed with life, or El Greco, Velazquez, Toulouse Loutrec, Van Cezzane Gogh, Iberian and African art, bullfighting or pigeons in the wind, naked Opium, surrealist or mercy for those who have less or bourgeois life. All this existed in Picasso. It was a contradiction, suffering and pleasure. His name was Ruiz direct, but as he left the life contramano decided something that nobody did at that time, signed his work with his name, Paul and his mother's name: Picasso (perhaps as a harbinger of the importance of women in throughout his long life) and thus summoned the beginning of a triumphant career, when he said laconically: "I am Picasso ." Surely influenced his personality the death of his sister Concepcion four years as he was ten, perhaps suicide for love Casagemas his close friend when he was twenty. This was modeled Picasso himself, a man determined to live intensely, between two World Wars and the Civil War his native Spain, between oppression and death tear neighbor, very present to evaluate his life that led him to fly the flag with the colors of freedom and pleasure to celebrate. Picasso was many "Picassos" stage the blue, pink or green, the intellectual, the surreal, the African, the anarchist, communist, the originator of "Cubism" and the lover and lover of dozens of women who I had for it officially, Fernande Olivier, Eva Gouel, Irene Lagut, Emilienne Paquette, Silvette Davil, Elvire Palladinin-You-You-, Olga, Marie-Thérèse, Dora, Françoise, Genevieve and Jacqueline. Picasso was a lover of love and superior wisdom summed up the feeling and the elderly, "let no man in love when they get older, but on the contrary, precisely age, when you stop ." Pablo Picasso was different. Expressed in his painting and sculpture art that you may not like many, as the present writer, but that impacts everyone. Picasso wanted to think with his drawings, with their forms, in game two and three dimensions, with their fabrics, their colors, with your messages in hieroglyphics, with voyeuristic eroticism and ever-present, war and peace symbols, that awakens reflection image of humans. The "Demoiselles d'Avignon", "Still Life with Chair grid", "Dance", "Figures on the edge of the sea", "Guernica" or "Las Meninas" is, among other of its two thousand works, more that art, philosophy are also graphic thought in speech, desperate cry for change, pure extravagance, try persuasion aloud with your pictures, try to negotiate quietly with life and all those who observe it, creating the mind, painting with the soul. This was and still is Picasso. Watch it and interpret it, a blessing.

Friday, December 10, 2010

Tricks For My Tech Deck





The world changes when covered with snow. It gets slower, more awkward, less secure. People forget their car and walks to take trams or buses to take and fill with people. We walk slowly, treading carefully, waiting for the trap of slippery ice under the snow. No land to support the firm steps.

I like the change. Or rather, I should. Because and I find it easier to camouflage my own clumsiness and insecurity. I have a theory that one goes through life in a way much like walking down the street. Sure, everyone has to walk several ways, depending on the situation, but there are certain features that do not change.

There are people walking with determination, knowing where to go, looking for the shortest path or dirrect. Some people go through the center of the village and keeps everybody out of the way he and others who are going to attack and do not care to collide with the other bystanders. There are walks distracted, they will not look ahead and face the other unintentionally. Some move slowly, stopping at each corner to talk and there are others who are very engrossed ignoring the world.

I generally walk a lot. Walking path. Way because I have time, and walk when I have not, because sometimes it's faster. I looked everywhere, especially to the people. Sometimes on purpose step where there are many, only to see them. But sometimes I think they come to me. I try not to interfere, I make room to pass. But seldom it happens that I got the step to me. Many times I have to dodge a very narrow space, or do I have to get off the path and go down the runway. Sometimes I do not know where to get involved, whether right or left, and end up crashing undecided.

should now make any conclusion about what is right or wrong and that something should change or something ... But no. Way as I can and as I please. I may anger people who put me on the road, or people who can not see. But I do not care much. Sometimes it's good to be invisible and sometimes you have to crash. For now, I slowly, carefully, paying attention to every step to avoid falling.

And while I fall ...

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Howmany Calories In Ham And Bean Soup



known mortal man and is such knowledge that wakes you up to the task of thinking. "One thing I am absolutely sure: I die, my life is ending, I have days and hours to live and my best wishes to be lots and lots but I can not deceive: this body I have it somewhere, not discover, expiration date recorded in indelible ink. This makes me wonder: is now, is when I'm alive when I think about what to do with this life to live . The topic can generate some anxiety, some fear and a bit of desperation. I admit it. But let's look different. After this The calm period of reflection and the way back from distress, " is so true that I die because it is so true that I am alive. If death is no longer being physically present in this life, I must say that somehow I have already once beaten to death! When? I was born. At least for me there is no eternal death because I feel the great joy of being alive! "

When notes its presence in the life of man is exalted, becomes aware, rejoices, and is the joy that affirms and accepts life over death, over fear, over despair. But it should not be a passenger but ecstasy an activity designed strategically and go beyond: to fight for celebrating life, to fight to be anesthetized, to combat the discomfort and complaining about everything, to fight the "not aware", to strive to be attentive to surprise and be surprised, to fight for fun, fight to "lighten" the backpacks and the faults that are loaded without knowing why or wherefore. This struggle extends to the activities with friends because friendship is the strongest bond that unites those who know we will die but we struggle together to live well, the best way possible. That is to realize.

Are Herpes Spots There All The Time

Realize I have no time to work

You, me, you, you, you, you, them, them, us. Substitute names with pronouns (that is its grammatical function) but everyone is included, or were or will be, if it is working. And this I speak, I think and dwell on a thought, do work on work. We'll see. What is this work? Why and how people work? Do we work too much? "Work occupies the center of our life time, that is, our lives are working? Do we do because we are obliged to do so? What and who makes us? Do you enjoy, we are happy the work we do? What would we do with our time if we did not work? In short, the claim of start awakens and excites. Come by parties.
There is a first simple answer but I'm not good enough. The word "work" is etymologically derived from "Trevajer" which means "torture, suffering, effort." Derived from "Tripalium" operating as a kind of trap with that in ancient times some people were tortured. This concept of work as a synonym for torture must have an explanation. And I remember the teachings of the Bible that I was repeated with such affection by the Marist Brothers to explain the punishment that God would have chosen-creator of man and star of this book, before the sin of the first pair of these payments man woman "I will eat by the sweat of your brow. " I quickly realized two things involved in this scenario: 1) Work is a divine punishment and 2) industry was born that day deodorant sweat-so ... -. But I am thinking about the first conclusion: if not for the sin of our relatives do not exist this torture. "Wow, I think. "What bad luck in the Paradise of the time there were priests, because had there been one, Mr. Adam and Ms. Eve could have confessed and we would not have to work." I continue with my thoughts (and sorry for the digression but this shot and I probably shoot more because are all closely linked). The reality is that it is because there were no cures or it was confessional, the end result was that there was no case and God punished them and all those who came later had to be laburar (I wonder why so much punishment for future offspring if sin was any lack "voluntary" against God's law, what will we who came after the sin supposedly committed by our first origins? scares me a little (almost nothing at this point in my life). Is not there will be any sin of our great-grandparents, grandparents or parents who do not know and which will inherit a punishment? In short, the logic of the context that explained to me indicates this could be, but this is not the issue. Returning to work). Well, it was. We are condemned to work. This consequence of sin caused guilt (of punishment are generated guilt, remorse, anger, and it is also true, reflections). The point is that Labour on this issue is a fault contained our ancestors managed as they could. Among them are Protestants (about 2 version of Catholicism) who developed the theory of the atonement of guilt that led us to sweat and work. They found no better way to amend and remedy the guilt to turn the concept and an extraordinary creativity, the reality of work as punishment became the opposite: work as a virtue. They saw human occupation in the consistent effort, the sacrifices that often involves a kind of vehicle of salvation. The punishment that God imposed on men should be glorified. Something like take your cross with dignity and do not complain that it is a virtue. And so to boast to his followers did not take a vacation or feeling guilty, again, if they did ... They confused and manipulated the truth to the faithful into believing that the work (remember the etymology: torture) was a prize and Through this conception many people mistake the way and work hard and confusing and more also because half confused with truth. And they hurt their work thinking that they are enjoying a premium, when the reality is that torture without knowing it and that's what life is going. Analicémoslo. Let us then
this and ask: "Why work?". And the answer must, with its pluses and minuses, will be "to meet our needs." And here begins the best part. What are our needs? Enumerémoslas. I invite you, whom I read that you make your list, cross out and correct it, but do it. Of these listed needs What are the basic oy which the superfluous? "Which job? If I answer that only the basic work should answer in detail what my basic needs and when I say I work for my needs superfluous should have a good reason behind spend hours and hours and hours of my life working for something superfluous. Will I be a slave to my superficialities? And speaking of time: How much time I devote to my job? It may be the core of my life. Twelve hours a day devoted to the work, ten, eight. Is it so? Is this reasonable? Let us start with an extreme example but it happens, people between transport and laburo hours, it takes twelve hours to work What do I do in the other twelve hours a day? There would appear to average eight hours devoted to sleep, which I only have four hours of wakefulness, Monday through Friday. How I spend my free time? All we hear a phrase that is repeated like a whip: "I have no time", "I love to do, go with you, enjoy it, but I can not because I have to work." Is this okay? Reflect: no time to do anything that I like is synonymous with having no life to do what I enjoy. Do not have a life to be dead. Time if there is life there and available. The fact that chooses not to devote to what I most want is just that, a decision that can have a lot of logic behind, but not required absolute.
Let's review the logic. Let us start from the premise that the work is not bad, evil is not hard to live because of work, the bad is to forget to live to work, the bad is not knowing exactly answer what are the limits I am willing to cross the demands of my work, the trouble is not clear on priorities. Work

general insurance is a necessity for many like you who read me. But as necessary as gymnastics or walk every day or visit our affections, or not miss this performance of my children at school at the garden party or primary when it was a lion or playing the flute ... but not clear. I can not. I have to work. It is an obligation. If I get kicked out. I lose my career. What career? The work idiot. There are priorities ... priorities, hierarchies in the use of the time of my life, needs, interests, decisions, actions.

Work is a duty imposed upon me by history, culture to get something that allows me to live is to live well but not working and working well. Do not confuse the means with the end. I think he works hard in this life. Too. And the main reasons are two: 1st) We do not know what to do with our spare time. We do not understand leisure. Despise him instead of appreciating it. We prefer that someone at work tells us to do than tell ourselves how we spend our time. Outsource resource most expensive of our existence: the decision of what to do. We prefer that another decision ..., and 2nd) We feel guilty if you do not work hard. We vanaglioramos of company size, our hours spent, the effort to come to the silly to be proud of not taking holidays ... for the job ... See? Until we get to ponder and understand that it is not a good person, but "is a hard worker." "He goes to work" is said as a compliment and not thinking about the meaning.

Nobody says no to work. But nobody told us we should not think about what we do with our lives, our time with our "slavery" to meet needs that are not. Work should allow us to grow as a person and not the person is lost from work. Work is a means to give us the good life but the good life often means no work. Work well is health, is to create, to recreate, is also the "recreational" we miss the school, is fun, enthusiastic, but not otherwise, is not sick, not bored. This is not working well.
Human dignity is not given by the work done or the employer to whom he devotes his hours of the day. His dignity is a human being who is not the title of the work needed. The work is a job to live and not living is an occupation to work. Let us slowly but convinced: "Today I can not work. I have no time .... "

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Puppies Bumps On Tails

located

I'm alone. It's night and I'm in my garden, sitting on a chaise lounge, occupying one square meter of land. A heavy book in my arms and light of a lantern that comes from behind me to read. Beginning to do so. I pause. I look up. Star night sky impeccable. I think. I'm in my neighborhood, who belongs to my people, my city, my state, my country. Country that is part of a continent, one of the five that exist in our world, our planet Earth. Planet where nearly seven billion people like me, in an area of \u200b\u200bthree hundred seventeen million square kilometers occupying a hemispherical surface, we usually see in pictures as a field representative. Area that is part of a solar system composed of several other planets in orbit around a star that gives us nothing less than light and heat, which we call the sun and that is two billion miles away from this round world we inhabit. I keep thinking. I resume reading. A beam emitted from its source sun takes eight minutes to reach my house, walking distance to my garden at the speed of light, ie three hundred thousand kilometers per second. I was impressed and can not stop reading. Our solar system, if you read yours and mine, is part of a galaxy in outer space, the cosmos, which we call the Milky Way (studied by Galileo in 1690 and by Kant in 1755 and called "milk" because when you look in the sky white color belies its star product, gases, and bodies that make up). Not if it were but concerned: this Milky Way is also "our" galaxy to give more details (and in the difficulty of giving exact numbers) say astronomical studies is between two hundred thousand to four hundred billion stars. I'm rapt. To plot it is somehow a "gated" enormous, "urbanization de puta madre "(the English would say, at least for its size, if not luxury). But I'm wrong. Is large but not quite. I read Carl Sagan and I find that there are many of these "neighborhoods" in the universe and that many galaxies double or even triple the size of "our" Milky Way. The amounts overwhelm me: it is estimated that there are over one hundred billion galaxies in the universe, which implies that there up there in the cosmos, nothing more, nothing less than seventy sextillion of stars (the number seven followed by twenty zeros , to be clear and express it in numbers: 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of their respective planets stars above our heads, some flashing and signaling of existence, others, many in the dark does not imply their absence ...). I do a moment of reflection. Again I look up and think "that piece of asshole am!!, I thought I was alone. How can we be so foolish and petulant and think that the only place where no life is this grain of sand we call Earth? ". Silence. Continuous observing the sky with a little more attention while gaping head spin, aware of our smallness. This makes me nervous. Change the subject. In my head turned a question: "For how long will all this in the space ?. "Sagan me answer it again: the stars and the universe would, as all studies, fifteen billion years old. Repitámsolo: fifteen thousand million years. I try to understand the figure, try to understand the time and for them to reflect: an average human life today covers eighty years (generations ago much less). Comparatively, this duration of life is a sigh. I still think. It's been fifteen billion years since the universe exists in this tiny part of the cosmos, on earth, human life began only forty thousand years ago with the appearance of a man "smart" our relatives "the man Cro-Magnon. "Studies on the cavemen and evolution confirms this. Forty thousand years since the" hommo sapiens sapiens, 2500 from Socrates, only two thousand from Christ. Comparatively, this time with the past calendar fifteen billion years old the universe would, again, is nothing, is a moment just yesterday ... I was inevitable question arises: "What has happened before when there was human life on earth? It was a long time: 14 billion nine hundred and sixty thousand years where no one thought ... where no reasoned ... where no one knew it was going to die .... just nature and animals. What was it like the time of our planet? When the man was slow in coming? ". I start to feel uncomfortable in my chaise. I move, I settle and close my eyes. I think back to size: in the context of astronomical dimensions of the" neighborhood "of stars the planets in which we live, our, earth, occupies much less, but much much less than a millimeter square, and my square foot garden, where I sit, is something like an atom molecule. I go to move. I think of human beings and in the short time that has history if I compare it precisely with the time of the cosmos ... Definitely I can not stay still. I get up from my chaise, I stretch my hands and legs slowly, carefully, walk across my garden, I look up and distracted for the last time (with a tad of embarrassment) and I prepare to enter the house. When you open the sliding door I see an ant, very small, which moves in a hurry to their nest. I'm careful not to step on and still view your route ... As I understand it better ...

finally roused me and I go home. Time, distance, space and dimensions come with me. Reality slapped me. I come to a conclusion: insignificant size, small place, little time, neighbors who do not know ... many ... I call this place it.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

How To Troubleshoot Alaska Coal Stoves

create, innovate, writing Beliefs and thoughts

Jules Florencio Cortázar was born Argentina Embassy in Brussels, Belgium on August 26, 1914. The son of an Argentine matriomonio by that time living in Europe, in 1918 he returned to Argentina and settled in Banfield, where he lived with his mother, aunt and sister. It was his mother who incidence in reading (with the great Jules Verne) and in fantasy. Cortazar will that she was watching the white clouds and silhouettes guess, and think about characters and stories. Julio Cortazar's child had a very fragile health and that fueled his passion for reading (so much so that a doctor ordered him to stop reading " because it made him ill "...). He studied at the Faculty and graduates Mariano Acosta Normal in 1935 as Professor of Arts, a title he used in his youth to work as teachers in various cities of the province of Buenos Aires. In 1944 he moved to Mendoza to give courses in French literature and the following year, having won the presidential election Perón decided to resign before yielding to pressure from a regime that intimidated him. Since there is professionally engaged in writing and in 1948 decided to study to become a certified translator of English and French. A three-year career in the nine months ago, an effort that causes neurosis and cure some of their fairy tales as "Circe" and "Houses Taken" (both stories intgrarán "Bestiary" published in 1951, a book that gives the beginning of a reputation that will not stop until his death.) Unhappy with the excesses of Peronism decide to leave the country and settle in Paris, France, city in which to live until the end of his days.

Julio Cortazar had a strong political commitment past their fifties. Toured America and won his copyright for political prisoners in the region. He was in Cuba and moved with the affection of his people by Che, ciurcunstancia who admire him to copy it to your own image (Ernesto Guevara's beard was what I decided, after a minor surgical procedure, to let it grow for imitate). This relationship with revolutionary Cuba was cut by Fidel when he publicly rebuked by his request for information on journalists persecuted by the Cuban government. Cortazar is also involved in the Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua, a country he visited on several occasions. Pra close its intensity, was also in the Chile of Allende, who sympathized with the regime despite serious doubts about its efficiency.

Julio Cortazar had a love life as passionate as it was in everything. His first marriage (1953) was to play along to accompany him, with interruptions, throughout his career. His second wife was a Lithuanian, Karvelis, (1967) which decided in its ideology influenced in their political commitment. Her third relationship (and remarriage) was with the Canadian Carol Dunlop dies Cortazar two years before allowing his first wife, Aurora, accompany him on his final illness (leukemia) until his death in Paris in 1984.

His life was an example of its intensity. Cortazar wrote stories, essays, stories, novels, plays, poetry. Gave numerous interviews where he has intimate and sincere to the public. Read many of his works which are exciting and left records ideolígicas views and policies, written and filmed, which allows be present, even online to new generations of stakeholders to study and admire. Cortazar

changed classical literature. It was original. Fantasized about the words, reading rhythms. He played with phrases and with readers. Gave rhythm to his writing. Box fan and Jazz, it seems that he punches with his lyrics and paragraphs in fiction and folly as well as his stories set to music that is heard between the lines and enjoyed in every point and part. Borges said. He was surprised with his talent and passion. Cortazar is that caresses the soul with his directorial debut, "Hopscotch", a book that had never been born if not for his story after "The Tracker" ("My little Rayuelita" according to author). Cortazar's creativity never ceases. There were many works of art that complement the great timeless Cortazar, who won the cronolgía of days and years, as Cronopios and Famas "," Examination "," The Book of Manuel "or" Last Round " .

Their creativity and innovation still leave us a murmur is heard and not understood. As he wrote in one of his stories has left readers "standing in a corner while looking at what they think, but think about what they see." Cortazar genuine. Cortazar great.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Community Service Recommendation Sample

Sometimes slow walking

A times I have to give. Sometimes I bring too much pain to open up. In those moments all the love I have I need it for me. I do not want to know the world. I close my iron curtain fall behind.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Will Severely Biten Nails Heal



"Ideas and Beliefs", so defined by the great Jose Ortega y Gasset. Differences both concepts and be aware of the implications of such differentiation will help us understand behaviors, experiences, ways of being (never better defined the term). We open the mind to understand people, nothing more nothing less ...

The "beliefs" are beliefs that live in us. They even do not see them. Are the soil and subsoil on which we rely to live. Any decision we take has its substrate in what shapes our beliefs. We "settled" on it. We may not be aware of our beliefs, but even so, we are our beliefs. Let us act as we act, we do because of our convictions. The

"Ideas" are all those thoughts, structures that appear in our lives as a result of our intellectual pursuit. They are not in the depths of our being, but only on the surface. The idea is a thought, is an occurrence, is an architecture-conscious world of intellectualism.

What is the difference? It must think of a thing and have it. Let's see a concrete example to explain this: Ortega explained relative to us can happen "if the reader comes to the street now." You can absolutely go to the right, left, in shelter from the cold or heat it, or think of the place where it goes, if it is near or far, but there is something that DO NOT think, if when you go there or not street ... This is a given, ie "has it." This is the belief, as others are ideas. We see here the distinction is one thing to think about the options, think about things (ideas) and the other is to have them (beliefs).

another example not as extreme. If you declare that my team is a "big family" and it turns out that the lowest setting the income statement of the balance of the fire company to dispose of 30% of the workforce, which at the time declared it was an idea, not a belief ... In this case the decision betrays us, we act on beliefs that were not in the "statement" but in the subsoil thereof. It was just an idea ... shows of brutal hypocrisy idea ... but in the end. These ideas are living in an unreal world: the arrival of reality acts belief.

return to the topic of beliefs and thoughts, beliefs and ideas in mind that the ideas you have, in the belief it is.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Quotes Aboutdeborah Sampson

See best

happened a year ago. I still remember it well, too well.
It was my secretary, it was Friday and went to a meeting near the Hilton Hotel in Puerto Madero. I went in and asked for the Business Center. I made a copy. I went to the fifth and while waiting to make me a photocopy and Scanning, people started walking really special for this floor. All warmly greeted to the person I was seeing who was behind the counter. I listened to the greetings that came from my back, " Hello friend," How's your day? ". . Short sentences were spoken with American tune (I know well and to make out) along with an affection that sounded like music between syllables. I turned with curiosity because the person who took care of me smiling in a particular way to greet them with his hand raised. I looked in detail. They came in wheelchairs, some without arms, hands all, some walked with a shorter leg, others were tiny stage, most were "otherwise" (because it is not for the "deformed"). Hotel employee looked at my face and I wonder then said: " is a hands-free convention painters." I nodded slowly. I got nervous. I did not know whether to greet or meet the smile with which I looked. I got the file scan my pen drive and walked quickly toward the elevator with his head confused. I got to the hallway, opened the door and went up with me three people: a very pretty girl with a poncho that covered a very young boy with a roll holder and a large mulatto then showed me his white teeth when I held the well kept door to enter. The elevator went down instead. I became more nervous. What was happening if I had pressed the "ground floor"? They laughed heartily and the blond girl looked down on the floor of the elevator transparent and shouted with joy when he recognized a friend. Moved in all directions and shouted to his mulatto friend, "is Ricardo! Is Ricardo!". He pulled over and bit her shoulder. I do not understand. What she was trying was to greet his friend, Ricardo beckoning to looking down the elevator from whom there was no distinction. My travel companion, this pretty little blonde with her poncho on your back, I could not say hello. I had no arms under the blanket. The mulatto was his "seeing-eye", his companion, a "normal" the care and support. And if I had to move her hands, she did it gladly. He did, always showing his white teeth. He enjoyed his work. Ricardo, down, almost hypnotized staring, reacted and raised his hand in the expected. That was happy with both. The boy who was to my right and who is my partner in this elevator (still getting high ...) was something strange, like something was missing, but I did not want or could not understand. Until my view (or my head) Discip: the paper holder had it hooked on something like a finger that left shoulder. Only one finger ... They talked among themselves with great sympathy, laughing the rise instead of fall. Inside I felt uncomfortable, not knowing where to look and to puteaba because the elevator seemed to Everest would go ... Suddenly stopped and started down. I thought "to end this quickly," . I looked down and making me the distracted side looking at the horizon ... or the south ... a lobby of a hotel that was approaching. Until we were coming. The elevator slows down and look up. The blond girl looked at me with round eyes and full, with an overwhelming sweetness, I smiled and said, "how nice ride share "!. Suffered as well. I did not know that answer ... I managed to look only and I swear I tried to reflect a "thank you ... I learned from you." I smiled embarrassed but grateful. Ricardo was waiting for them ...
went down and walked slowly. I needed air. I took to walking. Not far from my office. I tried in this way to understand what had happened. Scanned a document had a place to go and that had never been a point of meeting with people who gave me a life lesson. I was embarrassed, angry with the situation and complained about the wrong time and the elevator did not respond. They interpreted it differently: as a nice ride that I did not see ... I kept walking. It was silent, looking at what it looked. Were ten twenty blocks where I made a pact with same: do not want to miss more rides. My colleagues of the elevator had improved my diopter. Ophthalmologists were the best life now looked better.

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Dish Network Receiver 322 Hook Up





If you do not write, is because all I can say would be too obvious. I feel to be discovering something new, but was new to me. I see that my life is like millions of other lives, which is nothing extraordinary. I am a tiny grain of sand on an endless beach. Is that maturity?

But, drawing, drawing not something new. I look at the world and drawing what I see. No need to invent anything more, I love what it is. I do not feel the need to show inside, if the outside world is so interesting. Instead, what I want is to internalize the external seize a moment of reality, her through my eyes and my brain, recreate with my hands. So I can approach the world and touch. I can not say that would help me understand, but accept and to love each other. That's the way of how I relate to the world.

long been drawing the Christ, Virgin and Saints and I can not explain very well, since I am not Christian and do not know if I believe in God. But now I see much clearer. Not because I identify with the Saints, his divine qualities, or that attracts me suffering. No. I like the image as such, I know where is the force that attracts so many people, the force that makes them and worship and dear. I wonder why it happens just with these images, and not with others. And if re-drawing the icons of Saints Peruvians, it is because I want to approach people I do feel the force they generate, and whether I am also able to feel and even create it.

may now think I'm stupid, that this force is nothing more than faith, and that is not in the pictures but in ourselves. We put ourselves which we force them to fulfill our desires. And yes, in fact has much to do. But I insisito that something must have the image. Something that makes people stare and think about things that do not see, behind ...

If you do not write, does not mean that drawing. But sometimes drawing, and I feel like a grain of sand ...

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Gay Male Full Body Wax London Ontario

Grain of sand Where we come ... I rough


Image: Petr Malina

During my trip to Sweden three times I took the boat. Two Swedish ships were sometimes back and took a German ship that was to Rostock. The difference was amazing.

In Sweden I found as a very pleasant, neat and clean, and the Swedes as very kind, happy and well educated. Despite the harsh climate and a very short summer the Swedes are among the happiest people in the world. For our young democracy Czech Scandinavia have always served as an example of how a small country can operate within a community as large as the European.
The first two trips in the Swedish ships were welcome. People enjoyed the board the sun and did not care, strong wind. In the cafeteria quietly waiting in the queue, and the staff treated everyone with kindness and all spoke English. It was really easy to get used to that.

Rostock on the boat did was different. Most passengers were Swedish, but people in Eastern Europe, Germans, the Ukraine, Russia, Bulgaria, Slovakia ... and Czech Republic. Many of them were drivers of trucks or workers. And suddenly, after seeing the Swedish acostubrarme well dressed, athletes, healthy and well nourished, I was shocked to see people from "other Europe", worn, fat, bald, with dark circles, smelly and old clothes ... But not only was appearance but also the behavior. People came running to the cafeteria, colliding with each other, personnel forward and shouted in Russian (or whatever), knowing that they were German, and eagerly taking a quantity of food that could not be eaten.
I said, welcome home! and I felt a mixture of shame and sadness at the thought that's how we see the Swedes (German, French, English ..) also for us. In other words, is the world that I belong. A world that still was not sure where to go or who can walk well.

But then, to ask that another country would be born if given the chance to choose, I realized I did not find a better alternative. I am happy to be born in the place and time where I was born. I like the point from which I can see the world, the point has shaped me for who I am today. It seems more than perfect to have been born under communism, live in it just enough to remember the sadness and emptiness in which people learned to live, and it has collapsed just as I started to become aware. I could study and in an era of greater justice and freedom, I've lived through the change, I've seen how democracy was born and how hard is learning not ever neglect it.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Where Can You Play Apples To Apples Online



Sometimes I do not recognize. I'm not that be. And which is one of the periods of transformation in which I no longer enough to be who I am. Recently I discovered that women are going transformed from a time of life to another, redefined with every role that I have to represent. As a tadpole loses its wings to become a frog, she also loses something of themselves during the process of becoming a lover, partner, wife ... mother. So far I am not clear how that works to transform. Many times I see women on the street and wonder as they were when they were twenty, and where those girls are gone.

Recently the issue of motherhood is attacking me from all sides. So tired ... I have the opportunity to observe as women are turning around. Gradually lost almost all the friends I had. It sounds hard but it's a bit like that. Have become mothers despite having / is certain that nothing will change ("If you talk about diapers, I stop ahead!") Conversations that we are not now before. I look like the friend who can talk about other issues, not just their children but as they do not go away. And I do not stop when I speak of "diapers" because it seems unfair. I hear them, but it's as if I spoke the other side of river.

a woman may now seem anti-child. But this is not. Children have always liked and it seems that I liked too. I love spending time with my nephews or other children, enjoy the possibility of fond of children who are not mine. I think being a mother hardly feel it. I do not think that becoming a mother the world ends. But as I see, is quite different. I never had doubts about whether being a mother, but I think I have fear of losing my fins.

So I find it hard to identify with the woman I am now. I feel trapped in time, a tadpole from the water pretending to keep swimming but dying with every breath. I feel that I can not continue. Need to get a new being, one who can breathe the air without choking. I do not know how to ...

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Dragon Ball Yaoi Dojinshi

Translating

I have on my desk twenty letters from children Paucartambo. These letters of Peruvian children to their sponsors Czechs, sponsors who do not know but thanks to those who can study. This aid for poor gifted children and organizes Foundation Inca Cusco department, a small organization founded by Olga Vilímková after spending a year teaching in a school of the department of Cusco. Since 2001 has provided assistance to more than 930 children, many of them have graduated and now exercise their professions in their communities and a girl received Czech government scholarship and went to the University of Prague, where he studied Czech.

I, besides being proud sponsor of a Chibolo, I volunteered as a translator of the letters into Czech. For me it is a unique experience, a closer contact and authentic it could have. Most are children of 4th to 6th grade, and it is interesting to see the English skills of children whose mother tongue is Quechua. It causes me very tenderly read phrases like "In bacacion halegre and felis and state" or "I leave you with strong huabraso" or "Being proficional would be a great victory for me would be happy."

Some of the letters are a bit repetitive, they note that the boy did not know what to write, then put what the teacher said. Some tell of their lives, describing their homes, families and customs in the village. One even wrote a poem, where it has :"... there playing with my brothers, there is laughing, joking with my friends my hobejitas and grazing habes habes has Huallamoco to grass up to my rabbits. " There are more personal stories, which we note that the child can not express themselves well in Castilian, so it is not well understood. There is an undecipherable letter, which neither recognize whether English or Quechua, which seems to be a dyslexic.

And there's also sad and touching stories, where the child tells his troubles to the sponsor, being the only person who can complain. A girl has her dad Boracho that sticks to her and her mother, or a teacher who beats children in school: "My teacher was bad, we rubbed with pointer." He says: "Sponsors of mine, I want you to come, I can not come because Prague is away. But a little les conosco in buestra picture ...".

I wonder how the future of these children. As they affect the experience of meeting with the other world? How to continue studying, if you will find in Cusco discrimination by citizens of their own country? They will know that somewhere far away there is someone who considers worthy of a good education? Help them feel safer? And meet the expectations that graduates will be working in their communities, and not go to live "Better Life" to one of the largest cities?

is not known. But I want to believe they will, regardless of whether further study or not, just to see what literacy is for more than grades. And not only care about money that one gives but how much interest in other shows and how much love you put on the written word. Because it's good to see that there may be a dialogue between two people who do not speak the same language, who live far away and have not even seen. That despite many obstacles the letter to reach its final destination. I believe that you get to transform your look, attitude and values \u200b\u200bto enter the world of another. Because dialogue changes to its participants and to confront them, makes them more human.



Quote: Culture of peace, bilingualism and multiculturalism, Juan Carlos Godenzzi

Inka Foundation: http://www.inkaperu.cz/

Friday, February 26, 2010

Rash And Bumps On Forehead

Anniversary

November last year in Peru and I served ten years. For me it was love at first sight. And though we met by chance, without having planned or even thought of before, was an encounter that has shaped my life. I can not imagine who would be today without having made that trip. As a child I saw a documentary about astronauts, where one of them commented on his experience of seeing the world Earth from the universe. He said he felt a mixture of tenderness and responsibility. A feeling for the planet that has changed perspective forever. I do not know why I recorded both his testimony, but I also wanted to feel something like that someday.

It happened when I crossed the Atlantic on my first trip to Peru. And although so far not come to find out why and what this link has become so strong, I find some logic. You have to be predisposed to appreciate and love certain things, landscapes and people. I immediately recognized that I came to the place of my dreams, or rather to a place in the story that I did not dare to think existed. Not that I had found something so beautiful and idyllic, but it was something stronger than was unable and unwilling to resist. A force so far in my life was missing. Suddenly it did not matter who did not speak the language, I just decided to understand, communicate anyway.

now I wonder if that thing was that I liked so much, could not say. Were about twenty days in which I have seen only Lima and the north coast. Many things have shocked, surprised, gave me grief, I've loved or disliked. I've seen places and people that I was afraid. But I could not help but feel the attraction and curiosity. I do not always appeal must be positive. In other words, can be positive to arouse strong emotions, if that's what we want. And just as not all the unknown has to be attractive, but it can be if we want. I was interested. Watched people on the street and asked me to speak, I saw sleeping in the vans and was wondering where they went and took lives, read words like "Canto Grande" and "Stone Bridge" did not understand but sounded very poetic . I wondered how the people of the name "Toll", whose lights shone in the darkness of the desert.

Since then I have learned a lot of things. Not only in Peru but also for myself. I realized that speak Castilian things has awakened in me that know. Did not feel the same fear to express what happened to me in Czech. I found that this fear caused by not knowing enough, the fact of not being perfect as a Czech paralyzed me from the Czechs, that fear disappeared when I became an alien woman who did not have to speak well and that even expected to be different. It was very liberating, something that has helped me develop.

The English was not the first language I was learning, but neither the Russian nor English, something similar has happened to me because it was not associated with anything specific. In contrast, the English was part of something more complex than learning not to learn, but to understand a world. I found many parallels between Czech and English, especially in the way of saying things, creating sentences, the flexibility of words. It is said that English is easy to learn, at least in the beginning. I started reading and writing letters. At that time spent much time traveling by train from Prague to Moravia. All weekend undertook the journey of 5 hours and I went with my book and dictionary, writing. But then, when you arrive to Peru for the second time, did not understand much. He could say almost everything I needed but used to the speed and speaks of the Lima was more difficult. The mystery of the words still there, and come to understand has become a passion for me. Learning to live caused me great satisfaction. After seven months she dreamed in Castilian.

Before, when talking to myself, I spoke in dialect Prague despite loud he could not leave my accent Moravian. Now I took the Prague and the Moravian accent does not come out, but in my mind I speak in Castilian. Not always, but often is. I do not know why, but I am speaking Castilian other. More expressive, more communicative and more joyful. But more daring, more flirty and more rude. At least I think so. Because I do not know. I can not know how is my version in English. Like I'll never know how it sounds when I speak, how strong my accent or how I make mistakes. But what matter? The important thing is that there are people who despite all understand what I say. Recently