action novel with evolution
Charles Darwin was born in the town of Shrewsbury, in England, in 1809. From an early showed a passion unmatched by nature (his favorite hobby was collecting beetles). At 16 he began his studies at Oxford and at 21 was recommended to accompany Captain Fitzroy to investigate the southern end of America. Charles was the father who helped to make the decision and so a journey that eventually would become one of the most important events in world scientific history. He left the warship HMS Beagle in September 1831 and a two-year South America extended to five, returning to England, after passing through Australia, New Zealand and South Africa in October 1836. As the trip unfolded advances Charles sent his studies in England and when he returned home at 27 was already a famous researcher of nature. Darwin was astonished by the findings that was done in different places he visited (from marine fossils on the peaks of the Andes to the same animal species on continents away or adaptations that improved neighboring species in the Galapagos Islands or a few differences between early fetuses of a dog, bat or rabbit) and its analysis and conclusions given base to a work that changed the scientific view of life and has been confirmed by subsequent studies performed with many more instruments and tools the great Charles. Darwin's central thesis was presented in his book " The Origin of Species." In fact the title of this book is much longer and explains the backbone of your research. His full name is "The origin of species through natural selection and survival of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life" . Darwin argued here two theories should be viewed in detail. The first was the "evolution" which maintains that all animals and all existing plants descended from earlier, more primitive forms. and the second is that this development was due to the so-called Natural selection. It is an interesting fact that Charles' grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, had already given the theory of biological evolution of plants and animals but had not shown the "how" of his theory. His grandson, Charles Darwin, would explain the basis of small changes across vast spaces of time. Is that a vision of Darwin "Copernican" for that moment in history was to argue that the age of the earth was old enough to what scholars of the time specified. They believed that Earth was 6,000 years old. Darwin argued that their research will contribute elements to estimate a old diametrically greater than the above (and its argument that more precisely this time led to an evolution of living species). He calculated that the earth was 300 million years ago (we now know that was short and that the earth has a length 15 times higher than the estimates of Charles ...). His research led him to conclude that nature was a "natural selection" unfit to live life and that it was produced by the triumph of the strongest or most skilled to win the struggle for life (from poisonous cactus survive in the desert, through the plants will seduce you with its colors with the aim of attracting insect pollination help carry up small animals that use camouflage to escape or who, with the same objective, are faster than others.) Darwin argued that in this way the species has always been and will be improved and even resistance to disease was a quality that inherited variants that survive.
However, the most delicate in Darwin, and perhaps the most strident was a "Copernican revolution" in the science of the time, was that this was not the position of the Church. The religion taught that God was the creator of each and every one of the species and of course the human being. Charles Darwin came to demonstrate that this was not true. Is that when Darwin argued that when comparing developed fetuses can not distinguish human fetal rabbit, and concluded not only that evolution is covered vegetable and mineral life but the entire animal, including humans and therefore were distant relatives of "beasts." This was to offend the Church. This thesis and change "Darwinian" science originated that show that fish came amphibians, reptiles these reptiles and birds. And this cycle of life emerged from apes. And here the similarities begin. Is that along with the monkeys belong to men called primates (mammals and multicellular) and evolution over millions of years has shown us today, scientifically, that's where we come from. There have been mutations and adaptations over millions of years leading to the living animal, mineral and plant we have today. This has been the evolution.
In short, the years of scientific research has been vindicated by the great Darwin. So went further and had the luxury to philosophize about how an inorganic material may have originated from the first cell of life (through a combination of heat and chemicals) that over the years (and long run and many years) evolved to lead to early humans. His goal was science but the Church and the professors of the moment considered at the time as "the most dangerous man in England." This is the story of Charles Darwin. This is the story of life, its origin and its progress and development in the struggle to live (which has much to do with trading to live ...). So Darwin caused the revolution of evolution. Tengámoslo present. Today
0 comments:
Post a Comment